Номер части:


Науки и перечень статей вошедших в журнал:

DOI: 10.31618/ESU.2413-9335.2020.7.76.945
Дата публикации статьи в журнале: 2020/08/20
Название журнала: Евразийский Союз Ученых, Выпуск: 76, Том: 7, Страницы в выпуске: 18-23
Автор: Makovskaya Liliya Germanovna
Tashkent , Global Education Department Westminster International University in Tashkent , Senior lecturer
, ,
, ,
Анотация: Language assessment is widely discussed by specialists in applied linguistics and higher education. A growing body of literature has investigated the selection of appropriate scoring scales to be used in different teaching contexts. Given the significance of assessment in higher educational institutions, the article considers main approaches to testing language skills. It is explained that in the norm-referenced approach, students’ scores are shown in the relationship to other students in the group, university, or country. In the criterion-referenced approach, learners’ skills are assessed against a set of specific criteria. The article discusses the scoring scales for language assessment. Specifically, the holistic marking is based on the lecturers’ overall impression of the language assignment. University teachers assess language tasks analytically when they address each criterion separately. The article provides several recommendations for language teachers and increases awareness about the importance of developing marking scales for ensuring quality assessment in the university.
Ключевые слова: assessment  norm-referenced  criterion-referenced  scoring scales  holistic  analytic  criteria         
Данные для цитирования: Makovskaya Liliya Germanovna . APPROACHES TO ASSESSING LANGUAGE SKILLS AT HIGHER EDUCATIONAL INSTITUTIONS (18-23) // Евразийский Союз Ученых. Педагогические науки. 2020/08/20; 76(7):18-23. 10.31618/ESU.2413-9335.2020.7.76.945

Список литературы: 1.Alexander O., Argent S., Spencer J. EAP Essentials: A Teacher’s guide to Principles and Practice. Reading: Garnet Publishing Ltd.; 2008. 2.Biggs J., Tang C. Teaching for Quality Learning at University. 4th ed. Maidenhead: Open University Press; 2011. 3.Brown H.D. Language Assessment: Principles and Classroom Practices. New York: Pearson ESL; 2003. 4.Bruce I. Theory and Concepts of English for Academic Purposes. New York: Palgrave Macmillan; 2015. 5. Cambridge Assessment English. Assessing Writing Performance – Level B2. Cambridge: 23 Cambridge University Press; 2016. https://www.cambridgeenglish.org/Images/cambridgeenglish-assessing-writing-performance-at-level-b2.pdf 6.Coffin C., Curry M.J., Goodman S., Hewings A., Lillis T.M., Swann J. Teaching Academic Writing: A Toolkit for Higher Education . London and New York: Routledge; 2003. 7.Cohen L., Manion L., Morrison K., Wyse D. A Guide to Teaching Practice. Revised 5th ed. New York: Routledge; 2010. 8.Coombe C., Folse K., Hubley N. A Practical Guide to Assessing English Language Learners. Michigan: The University of Michigan Press; 2010. 9.De Chazal E. English for Academic Purposes. Oxford: Oxford University Press; 2014. 10.Fulcher G., Davidson F. Language Testing and Assessment: An Advanced Resource Book. New York: Routledge; 2007. 11. Jamieson J.; Hinkel, E. editors. Assessment of Classroom Language Learning. New York and London: Routledge; 2011. 12. Katz A.; Celce-Murcia M., Brinton D.M., Show M.A. editors. Assessment in Second Language Classrooms. 4th ed. Boston: National Geographic Learning; 2014. 13. Nicholls, G. Developing Teaching and Learning in Higher Education. London: RoutladgeFalmer; 2002. 14. Reece I., Walker S. Teaching, Training and Learning. 4th ed. Sunderland: Business Education Publishers Ltd.; 2002. 15.Weir C.J. Language Testing and Validation: An Evidence-based Approach. London: Palgrave Macmillan; 2005.

Записи созданы 442

Похожие записи

Начните вводить, то что вы ищите выше и нажмите кнопку Enter для поиска. Нажмите кнопку ESC для отмены.

Вернуться наверх