ULTRASOUND AS USEFUL TOOL FOR EVALUATION AGE-RELATED CHANGES AND PATHOLOGICAL LESIONS OF THE FACE SKIN (55-60)

DOI: 10.31618/ESU.2413-9335.2020.1.77.964

Дата публикации статьи в журнале: 2020/09/16

Название журнала: Евразийский Союз Ученых — публикация научных статей в ежемесячном научном журнале, Выпуск: 77, Том: 1, Страницы в выпуске: 55-60

Автор: Omurzakova Aliya Turatbekovna
, ,

Автор: Izranov Vladimir Aleksandrovich
, ,

Анотация: Introduction. Various skin parameters such as the thickness of the epidermal echo, dermis and subcutaneous tissue, the surface area of individual layers, the thickness of the subepidermal layer with a low echogenic effect, the caliber of blood vessels, as well as the presence or absence of blood flow in the vessels, can be investigated with ultrasound. The aim of our investigation was to evaluate age-related changes and pathological lesions of the face skin using ultrasound examination of the different anatomical areas of the face in young and older women. Materials and methods. The thickness of different skin layers (epidermis, dermis, hypodermis) was measured in the area of the interbrow zone, chin, nasolabial folds and cheeks in 52 patients aged 15 to 75 years (mean age 44.3±11.9 years) using an ultrasound scanner Mindray DC-8. The study was carried out in Department of Fundamental Medicine of the Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University. Statistical processing for the study results was performed in Microsoft Excel 2017 using average values (M), the reliability was determined using Student's criterion, and its critical level in this study was taken to be 0.05. Results and its discussion. The thickness of the epidermis was minimal in the nasolabial fold (0.039 cm) and the maximum (0.043 cm) in the chin. The thickness of the dermis was maximal in the interbrow zone (0.081 cm) and the smallest in the chin (0.062 cm). The thickness of the hypodermis was the biggest in the cheeks area (0.136 cm and 0.137 cm to the right and left, respectively), the smallest hypoderm thickness was recorded in the chin area (0.019 cm). A thickening of the dermis was established in patients after 40 years in all anatomical areas of the face with the achievement of a statistically significant difference in the nasolabial folds (p = 0.027) and cheeks (p = 0.01). It was found that the dermis was thickened in patients who used fillers in all anatomical areas of the face with a statistically significant (p <0.05) difference in the nasolabial folds. Conclusion. Until now, little attention has been paid to the study of age-related changes and some pathological lesions in the face skin by using ultrasound, so there are no standard parameters for assessing its thickness, which requires further research.

Ключевые слова: facial skin, epidermis,dermis,hypodermis,age,ultrasound examination of the skin,women older than 40 years,fillers,

Данные для цитирования: Omurzakova Aliya Turatbekovna Izranov Vladimir Aleksandrovich . ULTRASOUND AS USEFUL TOOL FOR EVALUATION AGE-RELATED CHANGES AND PATHOLOGICAL LESIONS OF THE FACE SKIN (55-60) // Евразийский Союз Ученых — публикация научных статей в ежемесячном научном журнале. Медицинские науки. 2020/09/16; 77(1):55-60. 10.31618/ESU.2413-9335.2020.1.77.964

Скачать в формате PDF

Список литературы: 1.Cotofana S., Fratila A. A. M., Schenck Т. L. et al. The Anatomy of the Aging Face: A Review // Facial Plast Surg 2016;32:253–260 2.Ilankovan V. Anatomy of ageing face. // Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Mar;52(3):195-202 3.Wong CH, Mendelson B. Newer understanding of specific ana- tomic targets in the aging face as applied to injectables: aging changes in the craniofacial skeleton and facial 4. Mlosek R. K., S. Malinowska. Ultrasound image of the skin, apparatus and imaging basics. // J Ultrason.2013 Jun; 13(53): 212–221. 5.Pellacani G. and Seidenari S. Variations in Facial Skin Thickness and Echogenicity with Site and Age // Acta Derm Venereol 1999; 79: 366-369. 6.Bendeck SE, Jacobe HT. Ultrasound as an outcome measure to assess disease activity in disorders of skin thickening: An example of the use of radiologic techniques to assess skin disease. Dermatologic Therapy 2007;20:86–92. 7.Alfageme R. F. Ecografía cutánea. // Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas, 2014, 105(10), 891–899. 8.Wortsman X. Identification and Complications of Cosmetic Fillers: Sonography First. // J Ultrasound Med. 2015 Jul;34(7):1163-72. 9.Chiang YZ, Pierone G, Al-Niaimi F. Dermal fillers: pathophysiology, prevention and treatment of complications. // J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2017 Mar;31(3):405-413 10.Parulan MAA, Sundar G, Lum JH, Ramachandran U. A case report on dermal fillerrelated periorbital granuloma formation. // Orbit. 2019 Apr;38(2):169-172. 11. Alcântara CEP, Noronha MS, Cunha JF, Flores IL, Mesquita RA. Granulomatous reaction to hyaluronic acid filler material in oral and perioral region: A case report and review of literature. // J Cosmet Dermatol. 2018 Aug; 17(4):578-583. 12. Windhager S., Mitteroecker P., Rupić I. et al. Facial aging trajectories: A common shape pattern in male and female faces is disrupted after menopause // Am J Phys Anthropol. 2019 Aug; 169(4): 678–688. 13. Lephart E. D. A review of the role of estrogen in dermal aging and facial attractiveness in women.// Journal of Cosmetic Dermatology, 2018, 17(3), 282– 288. 14. Tobin D. J. Introduction to skin aging. // Journal of Tissue Viability, 2017, 26(1), 37–46. 15.Brincat M. P., Baron Y. M., & Galea R. Estrogens and the skin. // Climacteric, 2005, 8(2), 110–123 16. Marcos-Garcés V., P. Molina Aguilar, C. Bea Serrano, V.García Bustos, J. Benavent Seguí, A. Ferrández Izquierdo, A. Ruiz-Saurí. Agerelated dermal collagen changes during development, maturation and ageing – a morphometric and comparative study // J. Anat., 2014,225:98-108. 17. Schreml S et al. Impact of age and body site on adult female skin surface pH. // Dermatology 2012;224(1):66- 71. 18. Kawabata K., M. Kobayashi, A. Kusaka- Kikushima, et al. A new objective histological scale for studying human photoaged skin // Skin Res. Technol., 2014, 2: 155-163 19. Bruno V.H., A.Bernard, N.O.Fortunel. Agerelated evolutions of the dermis: Clinical signs, fibroblast and extracellular matrix dynamics // Mechanisms of Ageing and Development. 2019, Volume 177: 150-156. 20. HumbertP., C. Viennet, K. Legagneux, F. Gra ndmottet, S.Robin, T. Oddos, P. Muret. In the shadow of the wrinkle: theories. // J. Cosmet. Dermatol., 2012, 11: 72-78. 21. Mizukoshi K., Yonekura, M. Futagawa, T. Na kamura, K.Hirayama, K. Tak ahashi. Changes in dermal papilla structures due to aging in the facial cheek region. // Skin Res. Technol., 2015, 21: 224-231. 22. Oh J.H., Y.K. Kim, J.Y. Jung, J.E. et al. Changes in glycosaminoglycans and related proteoglycans in intrinsically aged human skin in vivoю // Exp. Dermatol., 2011, 20: 454-456. 23. Ahmed T., A. Nash, K.E. Clark, et al. Combining nano-physical and computational investigations to understand the nature of aging in dermal collagen. // Int. J. Nanomed., 2017, 21: 33033314 УДК 615.322 24. Bentov I, Reed MJ. The effect of aging on the cutaneous microvasculature. Microvasc Res. 2015; 100:25–31 25. Gomi Т., Imamura Т. Age-related changes in the vasculature of the dermis of the upper lip vermilion. // Aging (Albany NY). 2019 Jun 15; 11(11): 3551– 3560. 26. Karymov O. N., S. A. Kalashnikova, I. O. Solov'eva, L. V. Polyakova. Gistotopograficheskie osobennosti stroeniya kozhi lica. // Zhurnal anatomii i gistopatologii. – 2017. – T. 6, No 1 s. – 29-32 27. Nkengne A, Bertin C. Aging and facial changes--documenting clinical signs, part 1: clinical changes of the aging face. //Skinmed. 2012 SepOct;10(5):284-9. 28. Fernández V., Álvarez B., Centeno F. et al Cutaneous ultrasound and dermal fillers. // Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2015 Nov; 106 Suppl 1:87-95. 29. Wortsman X, Wortsman J, Orlandi C, Cardenas G, Sazunic I, Jemec GB. Ultrasound detection and identification of cosmetic fillers in the skin.J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. // 2012 Mar; 26(3):292-301 21. 30.Cotofana S, Schenck TL, Trevidic P, et al. Midface: clinical anatomy and regional approaches with injectable fillers. Plast Reconstr Surg 2015;136(5, Suppl):219S–234S 31. Kim JS. Changes in Dermal Thickness in Biopsy Study of Histologic Findings After a Single Injection of Polycaprolactone-Based Filler into the Dermis. // Aesthet Surg J. 2019 Nov 13;39(12):NP484NP494. 32. Kim JA, Van Abel D. Neocollagenesis in human tissue injected with a polycaprolactone-based dermal filler. // J Cosmet Laser Ther. 2015 Apr;17(2):99-101.